Google Ads Agency & Google Performance Marketing
Your best-performing campaign is probably buying customers you already had. Brand search is not acquisition.
We separate demand you created from demand you captured, open up what Performance Max is actually spending on, and report cost per acquired customer rather than cost per conversion.
- Priced on scope, never a percentage of your ad spend
- Offline conversion import so bidding learns from closed revenue
- Brand and non-brand reported separately, always
A blended Google account flatters itself
Brand search converts at a rate no other campaign can match, because those people were already looking for you. Blend it into an account-level ROAS and everything looks efficient — including the non-brand campaigns quietly losing money underneath. Performance Max compounds this: it spends across Search, Shopping, YouTube, Display, Gmail and Discover in one budget, will absorb brand queries unless you actively exclude them, and reports the result as a single number with limited visibility into where it went. Meanwhile smart bidding optimises toward the conversion action you selected, which for most accounts is a form fill or an add-to-cart, not a customer. The account is doing exactly what it was told. The instructions were the problem.
Platform-reported conversions versus booked revenue. Four advertising channels each report a share of the same conversions — Meta, Google, LinkedIn and YouTube. Because each measures inside its own attribution window with no visibility of the others, their combined claimed total is larger than the revenue actually recorded in the ledger.
Symptoms, causes and what they cost
Account ROAS looks strong but new customer growth is flat
Why it happens: Brand search and returning-customer traffic are carrying the blended average. Strip them out and the non-brand campaigns responsible for actual growth often look very different.
What it costs: You keep funding a number that mostly measures demand you already had, and under-fund the campaigns that create it.
Performance Max spends the budget and nobody can explain where
Why it happens: PMax reports at the campaign level with limited asset-group and placement detail. Without brand exclusions, account-level negatives and a clean new-customer signal, it will take the cheapest conversions available — which are usually people already in-market for you.
What it costs: Your most opaque campaign becomes your largest line item, and it is optimising against your easiest wins.
Broad match plus smart bidding widened the queries and worsened the leads
Why it happens: Broad match now interprets intent rather than matching text, and smart bidding will chase whatever the conversion action rewards. If that action is a form fill, it will find people who fill in forms.
What it costs: Impression share and conversion volume both rise while cost per genuinely qualified customer rises faster.
Sales close weeks later and Google never finds out
Why it happens: Without offline conversion import, the platform's learning stops at the form. Every downstream signal — qualified, opportunity, closed-won, contract value — is invisible to the bidding algorithm.
What it costs: You are asking Google to optimise for revenue while only ever showing it enquiries.
Where growth is normally stuck
- Brand and non-brand reported as one blended number, so neither can be managed
- Performance Max running without brand exclusions or account-level negative lists
- Conversion actions set to form fills or add-to-carts rather than qualified or closed outcomes
- No offline conversion import, so closed-won revenue never reaches the bidding model
- Enhanced Conversions not deployed, losing match rates that consent and cookie limits erode
- Search terms reviewed rarely, so broad match drift goes uncorrected for months
- Shopping feed quality treated as a merchandising task rather than a bidding input
Conversion signal loss between the browser and the ad platform. Conversions fall at each stage of browser-side collection: tracking prevention and consent choices remove roughly a third, and further loss occurs before the event reaches the ad platform. A final bar shows the larger share that survives when events are also sent server-side.
Our solutions — matched to the problem you have
- Lower the cost of every customer you win. — for: “Every customer costs more than the last one”. Read more
- Your growth stalled. Your CAC didn't. — for: “Spend keeps rising and profit does not follow”. Read more
- Build the model that tells you if the business works. — for: “You cannot prove the business works at a unit level”. Read more
- Fix the leaks that cost you the most. — for: “Traffic arrives and does not convert”. Read more
- Modern search channels are capturing your buyer's intent. — for: “Buyers are asking AI assistants instead of searching”. Read more
Our services
Measurement first
Nothing downstream is trustworthy until this is right. We start here on almost every engagement, because optimising against numbers that do not reconcile just reaches the wrong destination faster.
- Server-side Conversions API
- Google Enhanced Conversions
- Analytics & technical telemetry
- Attribution audits
Search & Shopping buying
Campaign structure, bidding and feed quality managed against acquired-customer cost rather than platform-reported conversions.
Conversion & retention
Where the funnel rather than the ad is the binding constraint, more traffic makes the problem more expensive rather than smaller.
What we actually do on a Google account
The work splits between making the account tell the truth about what it is buying, and making the bidding algorithm learn from outcomes that happen after the click.
- Separate brand, non-brand and returning-customer performance so each is managed on its own economics
- Restructure Performance Max with brand exclusions, account-level negatives and asset groups you can actually read
- Deploy Enhanced Conversions to recover match rates lost to consent and cookie restrictions
- Import offline conversions — qualified, opportunity, closed-won, with values — so smart bidding optimises toward revenue
- Move conversion actions down the funnel from form fill to the outcome that correlates with money
- Rebuild search term and negative keyword hygiene, particularly where broad match has drifted
- Treat the Shopping feed as a bidding input: titles, attributes and availability as performance levers
How it runs
The engagement sequence, phase by phase. Four sequential phases, beginning with diagnosis and measurement before any campaign changes are made.
Days 1–10 — Split the account before judging it
Read-only access to Google Ads, Analytics, Merchant Center and CRM. We rebuild reporting with brand, non-brand and returning customers separated, then compare that against booked revenue. Most accounts look materially different once this split exists.
Weeks 2–4 — Connect the account to outcomes
Enhanced Conversions, offline conversion import from your CRM, and conversion actions moved to the deepest event that reliably fires. Bidding cannot optimise toward revenue it has never been shown.
Weeks 4–8 — Restructure and rebuild the query surface
Performance Max rebuilt with exclusions and readable asset groups, search term and negative hygiene restored, budget reallocated on the split reporting, and feed quality addressed where Shopping is a material share.
Ongoing — Manage non-brand on its own economics
Weekly against cost per acquired customer and contribution, with brand reported separately rather than folded in. When non-brand cannot be made to work at your margins, we will say so.
Why we insist on separating brand from everything else
Brand search is the cheapest conversion in any account and the least incremental — a large share of those people would have found you regardless. Reporting it inside a blended ROAS is the single most common way a Google account misleads the person paying for it, and it is very convenient for an agency paid on spend. Separating it usually makes the headline number look worse and every subsequent decision better. We would rather hand you an uncomfortable number you can act on than a flattering one you cannot.
Google Ads agency or Google performance marketing agency?
A PPC agency in the traditional sense manages keywords, bids, ads and budgets, and reports conversions and cost per conversion. A Google performance marketing agency is answerable for what those conversions are worth: whether they are new customers or people who would have found you anyway, whether leads became pipeline, and whether the account makes money after media costs.
On Google, the difference shows up in three places. Brand and non-brand search are reported separately, because blending them hides whether you are acquiring anyone new. Conversions are tied back to revenue through enhanced conversions and offline conversion import, so Smart Bidding learns from closed business rather than form fills. And the channel mix — Search, Performance Max, Shopping, Demand Gen and YouTube — is judged on incremental contribution rather than on whichever campaign claims the most credit.
What Google Ads management with Fluxsy includes
An ongoing engagement covers search term mining and negative keyword management; account structure that separates brand, non-brand, competitor and Shopping demand; Performance Max set up with clean asset groups, a healthy Merchant Center feed for retail, and brand exclusions where appropriate; conversion tracking with enhanced conversions and offline conversion import from your CRM; bid strategy targets derived from your margins rather than set by habit; landing page tests where conversion rate is the constraint; and reporting that shows new-customer acquisition and cost per acquired customer.
For B2B and lead-generation accounts, the most valuable work is usually connecting Google Ads to the CRM so that bidding optimises toward qualified opportunities. Our comparison of Demand Gen and Performance Max for B2B pipeline explains how we decide which campaign types earn budget.
Agency, in-house or freelancer for Google Ads?
Google Ads rewards process, and a capable freelancer can run a simple account well — a local service business with a handful of search campaigns and phone-call conversions, for example. In-house makes sense when search is central to the business and the volume of keywords, products and markets justifies a full-time specialist.
An outside partner is most useful when the account has become complex enough that structure and measurement matter more than day-to-day bid changes: Performance Max with a large product feed, several markets or languages, offline conversions from a long sales cycle, or a suspicion that brand search is propping up the numbers. Whichever route you choose, make sure the account sits in your own Google Ads login, with the agency linked through its manager account rather than owning it.
How to evaluate a Google Ads agency
Ask to see how they would report brand and non-brand performance separately. Ask what they would do about Performance Max — how they get visibility into where it spends, and whether they would exclude brand terms. Ask how conversions will be tied to revenue or pipeline, and whether they set up offline conversion import. Ask how often they review the search terms report and who does it.
Then check the commercial basics: whether the fee depends on your spend, who owns the account and its history, how long the minimum term is, and who will actually work on it. Our guide to auditing a performance marketing agency in 48 hours gives a checklist you can use on your current provider as well as new ones.
What you get out of it
You can see what growth actually costs
Non-brand cost per acquired customer, reported on its own, is the number that tells you whether you can scale.
Performance Max becomes legible
With brand excluded and asset groups structured deliberately, PMax stops being a black box you fund on faith.
Bidding learns from revenue, not enquiries
Offline conversion import changes what smart bidding pursues — usually the single largest lever on a long-cycle account.
Budget stops chasing the easiest conversions
When the conversion action moves down the funnel, the algorithm stops optimising for the cheapest form fill available.
Cumulative contribution against customer acquisition cost over twelve months. Contribution accumulates month by month as a rising line, while acquisition cost is a flat line paid up front. The two cross once cumulative contribution overtakes acquisition cost. The shaded area before that crossing is the payback period, during which capital is committed.
Published engagements
-
How a Luxury Car Dealer Went From Near-Zero Enquiries to ~100/Month
— Automotive & Local Retail
— Inbound Monthly Phone Enquiries: ~0 Enquiries/mo → ~100 Enquiries/mo
A luxury dealership in Bengaluru had a gorgeous physical presence but zero local search visibility. Here is how a local visibility, GBP, and search ad rebuild generated ~100 high-intent enquiries in three weeks.
-
How an Online School Broke a 40–50 Admissions Ceiling and 12X'd Admissions in One Month
— EdTech & K-12
— Monthly Admissions (one month): 40–50 / mo → 12X Admissions
An online school had strong creatives, good CTR, and high engagement but was stuck at 40–50 admissions/month — the ceiling was downstream of the click. A senior operator fixed lead quality, CPL, pipeline leakage, broken APIs, cohorting, ICP, and a day-to-day 76-metric MIS to deliver a 12X admissions lift in one month. Read the full breakdown at /resource/blogs/edtech-online-school-12x-admissions-case-study.
-
How a Global EdTech Fixed a Sub-1 ROAS by Rebuilding the Funnel
— EdTech & Upskilling
— Return on Ad Spend across global geos: Sub-1 ROAS (0.5x) → Up to 3.0x ROAS
A global upskilling platform was running ROAS below 1 in major markets. Here is the geo-by-geo funnel, landing page rebuild, and Andromeda creative testing framework that cut CPL 60-70% and lifted ROAS by 80% to 300%.
-
Attributing 94% of Digital Leads to Dealership Deliveries
— Automotive Growth
— Closed Acquisition Cost reduction: $412 Lead CAC → $184 Closed CAC
Bridging the online car configuration path with physical showroom sales using direct, server-side DMS integration.
Client names are withheld under NDA. Every figure comes from the engagement it is attached to.
This is for you if
- Google is a material channel and brand is folded into your reported ROAS
- Performance Max is a large share of spend and you cannot explain its results
- Your sales cycle runs weeks or months and nothing downstream reaches the platform
- Lead volume rose after a broad match or smart bidding change and quality fell
- You want Enhanced Conversions and offline import built in your own account
Do not hire us if
- Almost all your volume is brand search and the business is not trying to grow non-brand. There is little for us to improve and we will tell you.
- Your margins cannot support non-brand acquisition at any realistic CPC. That is a pricing or product problem, not a media one.
- You want someone to manage keywords and report conversions. That is a cheaper service and several firms do it well.
Industries we serve
D2C & e-commerce
Shopping feed quality as a bidding input, and margin-aware values rather than flat revenue.
B2B SaaS
Offline conversion import so bidding optimises on opportunities and closed-won, not demo requests.
EdTech
Long consideration windows where the enquiry and the enrolment are months apart.
Real estate
High-value, geography-bound search where lead quality dominates lead volume.
Automotive & local retail
Local intent that converts offline, weeks after the click that Google measured.
Fintech & regulated
Consent-constrained measurement where Enhanced Conversions must be scoped carefully.
Check your own numbers before you talk to anyone
A working spreadsheet with live formulas: spend through to net contribution, blended CAC including the fees your ad platform excludes, and payback computed on contribution rather than revenue. No email required — it is a file, and you should be able to check our thinking before you hear our pitch.
Frequently Asked Questions
- What does a Google performance marketing agency do?
- It manages Google Search, Performance Max, Shopping, Demand Gen and YouTube campaigns against business outcomes — new customers, pipeline and profit — rather than cost per conversion alone. That includes separating brand from non-brand demand, connecting conversions to revenue with enhanced conversions and offline imports, and improving landing pages.
- How much does a Google Ads agency cost?
- Common models are a percentage of ad spend, a flat monthly fee, or a hybrid. Fluxsy does not take a percentage of spend. Every engagement is a monthly retainer priced on scope — $2,500–$6,000 per month in the US, ₹1,00,000–₹5,00,000 in India, £2,200–£5,000 in the UK, AED 4,000–AED 10,000 in the UAE, A$3,000–A$7,000 in Australia, C$3,000–C$7,000 in Canada, S$3,000–S$7,000 in Singapore and €2,500–€5,000 in Europe — depending on the number of channels and markets and how much tracking and CRM work is involved.
- Should I hire a Google Ads agency or manage PPC in-house?
- Simple, stable accounts can be run well in-house or by a freelancer. An agency or partner adds most value when the account is complex — Performance Max with a large feed, several markets, offline conversions from a long sales cycle — or when results have stalled and the measurement needs rebuilding.
- Should brand search be in our Google Ads reporting at all?
- It should be run, and it should be reported separately. Brand campaigns are cheap insurance against competitors bidding on your name, and they convert extremely well because those people already know you. The mistake is blending them into an account-level ROAS, where they make non-brand look far healthier than it is. Report both; manage them on different economics.
- Is Performance Max worth running given how little it shows you?
- For most e-commerce accounts, yes — but only with brand queries excluded, account-level negatives applied and asset groups structured so results are readable. Run without those, it will find the cheapest conversions in your account, which are usually people already searching for you, and report them as incremental growth.
- What is offline conversion import and do we need it?
- It sends events that happen after the click — qualified, opportunity, closed-won, with values — from your CRM back into Google Ads. If your sales cycle is longer than a few days, it is usually the highest-return change available, because without it smart bidding is optimising toward form fills while you are trying to buy customers.
- Broad match increased our leads. Why would we change it?
- Broad match plus smart bidding will reliably increase volume. The question is what happened to cost per closed customer, which most accounts do not measure. If the conversion action is a form fill, the system is doing exactly what it was asked. Move the conversion action downstream and the same setting often behaves very differently.
- How is this different from what a normal PPC agency does?
- Most of the work is outside the ads interface. Separating brand, importing closed-won revenue, deploying Enhanced Conversions and fixing feed quality are the levers that move an account materially. Keyword and bid management matters, but it is rarely the binding constraint on an account of any size.
- Do you charge a percentage of ad spend?
- No. That model pays the agency more when your budget grows, whether or not the growth was profitable, and it makes recommending a spend reduction structurally irrational. Every engagement is a monthly retainer priced on scope — $2,500–$6,000 per month in the US, ₹1,00,000–₹5,00,000 in India, £2,200–£5,000 in the UK, AED 4,000–AED 10,000 in the UAE, A$3,000–A$7,000 in Australia, C$3,000–C$7,000 in Canada, S$3,000–S$7,000 in Singapore and €2,500–€5,000 in Europe — depending on the number of channels and markets and how much tracking and CRM work is involved.
- Do you work with companies outside India?
- Yes. We are based in Bengaluru and work with companies across the US, UK, UAE, Singapore, Australia, Canada, New Zealand and Ireland. Engagements run remotely with working hours overlapping your timezone.
- Who owns the tracking setup and models when we stop working together?
- You do, entirely. Everything is built in your accounts under your credentials — server-side tracking configuration, unit-economics models, dashboards, playbooks. We do not hold code or withhold access at the end of an engagement.
- Why can we not see your client names?
- Our clients are under NDA, so engagements are described by sector and situation rather than named. We would rather show you a real result with the name withheld than a named logo we cannot substantiate, and we will walk you through the methodology and the measurement on a call.
How we work
- Priced on scope, never as a percentage of your ad spend
- Every model, script, tracking configuration and dashboard stays in your accounts
- Client names withheld under NDA — methodology walked through on a call
- Senior operators on the account, not a junior team learning on your budget
- We will tell you when the constraint is somewhere we are not
Bring your Google Ads account
Forty-five minutes against your real data. You leave with brand and non-brand separated and a clear view of what growth actually costs you — whether or not you work with us.