Google Ads Agency & Google Performance Marketing

Your best-performing campaign is probably buying customers you already had. Brand search is not acquisition.

We separate demand you created from demand you captured, open up what Performance Max is actually spending on, and report cost per acquired customer rather than cost per conversion.

A blended Google account flatters itself

Brand search converts at a rate no other campaign can match, because those people were already looking for you. Blend it into an account-level ROAS and everything looks efficient — including the non-brand campaigns quietly losing money underneath. Performance Max compounds this: it spends across Search, Shopping, YouTube, Display, Gmail and Discover in one budget, will absorb brand queries unless you actively exclude them, and reports the result as a single number with limited visibility into where it went. Meanwhile smart bidding optimises toward the conversion action you selected, which for most accounts is a form fill or an add-to-cart, not a customer. The account is doing exactly what it was told. The instructions were the problem.

Platform-reported conversions versus booked revenue. Four advertising channels each report a share of the same conversions — Meta, Google, LinkedIn and YouTube. Because each measures inside its own attribution window with no visibility of the others, their combined claimed total is larger than the revenue actually recorded in the ledger.

Illustrative. Each platform reports the conversions it believes it influenced, inside its own attribution window, with no visibility of the others — so the same order gets claimed more than once and the totals exceed what finance booked. The gap widens with every channel you add.

Symptoms, causes and what they cost

Account ROAS looks strong but new customer growth is flat

Why it happens: Brand search and returning-customer traffic are carrying the blended average. Strip them out and the non-brand campaigns responsible for actual growth often look very different.

What it costs: You keep funding a number that mostly measures demand you already had, and under-fund the campaigns that create it.

Performance Max spends the budget and nobody can explain where

Why it happens: PMax reports at the campaign level with limited asset-group and placement detail. Without brand exclusions, account-level negatives and a clean new-customer signal, it will take the cheapest conversions available — which are usually people already in-market for you.

What it costs: Your most opaque campaign becomes your largest line item, and it is optimising against your easiest wins.

Broad match plus smart bidding widened the queries and worsened the leads

Why it happens: Broad match now interprets intent rather than matching text, and smart bidding will chase whatever the conversion action rewards. If that action is a form fill, it will find people who fill in forms.

What it costs: Impression share and conversion volume both rise while cost per genuinely qualified customer rises faster.

Sales close weeks later and Google never finds out

Why it happens: Without offline conversion import, the platform's learning stops at the form. Every downstream signal — qualified, opportunity, closed-won, contract value — is invisible to the bidding algorithm.

What it costs: You are asking Google to optimise for revenue while only ever showing it enquiries.

Where growth is normally stuck

Conversion signal loss between the browser and the ad platform. Conversions fall at each stage of browser-side collection: tracking prevention and consent choices remove roughly a third, and further loss occurs before the event reaches the ad platform. A final bar shows the larger share that survives when events are also sent server-side.

Illustrative. Browser-side collection loses signal to tracking prevention, consent choices and blockers before it ever reaches the ad platform. Server-side events recover much of that gap — not all of it, and never the part a visitor declined.

Our solutions — matched to the problem you have

Our services

Measurement first

Nothing downstream is trustworthy until this is right. We start here on almost every engagement, because optimising against numbers that do not reconcile just reaches the wrong destination faster.

Search & Shopping buying

Campaign structure, bidding and feed quality managed against acquired-customer cost rather than platform-reported conversions.

Conversion & retention

Where the funnel rather than the ad is the binding constraint, more traffic makes the problem more expensive rather than smaller.

What we actually do on a Google account

The work splits between making the account tell the truth about what it is buying, and making the bidding algorithm learn from outcomes that happen after the click.

How it runs

The engagement sequence, phase by phase. Four sequential phases, beginning with diagnosis and measurement before any campaign changes are made.

The order is deliberate. Acquisition work built on unreconciled measurement compounds the error, so the measurement layer is corrected before any campaign changes.

Days 1–10 — Split the account before judging it

Read-only access to Google Ads, Analytics, Merchant Center and CRM. We rebuild reporting with brand, non-brand and returning customers separated, then compare that against booked revenue. Most accounts look materially different once this split exists.

Weeks 2–4 — Connect the account to outcomes

Enhanced Conversions, offline conversion import from your CRM, and conversion actions moved to the deepest event that reliably fires. Bidding cannot optimise toward revenue it has never been shown.

Weeks 4–8 — Restructure and rebuild the query surface

Performance Max rebuilt with exclusions and readable asset groups, search term and negative hygiene restored, budget reallocated on the split reporting, and feed quality addressed where Shopping is a material share.

Ongoing — Manage non-brand on its own economics

Weekly against cost per acquired customer and contribution, with brand reported separately rather than folded in. When non-brand cannot be made to work at your margins, we will say so.

Why we insist on separating brand from everything else

Brand search is the cheapest conversion in any account and the least incremental — a large share of those people would have found you regardless. Reporting it inside a blended ROAS is the single most common way a Google account misleads the person paying for it, and it is very convenient for an agency paid on spend. Separating it usually makes the headline number look worse and every subsequent decision better. We would rather hand you an uncomfortable number you can act on than a flattering one you cannot.

Google Ads agency or Google performance marketing agency?

A PPC agency in the traditional sense manages keywords, bids, ads and budgets, and reports conversions and cost per conversion. A Google performance marketing agency is answerable for what those conversions are worth: whether they are new customers or people who would have found you anyway, whether leads became pipeline, and whether the account makes money after media costs.

On Google, the difference shows up in three places. Brand and non-brand search are reported separately, because blending them hides whether you are acquiring anyone new. Conversions are tied back to revenue through enhanced conversions and offline conversion import, so Smart Bidding learns from closed business rather than form fills. And the channel mix — Search, Performance Max, Shopping, Demand Gen and YouTube — is judged on incremental contribution rather than on whichever campaign claims the most credit.

What Google Ads management with Fluxsy includes

An ongoing engagement covers search term mining and negative keyword management; account structure that separates brand, non-brand, competitor and Shopping demand; Performance Max set up with clean asset groups, a healthy Merchant Center feed for retail, and brand exclusions where appropriate; conversion tracking with enhanced conversions and offline conversion import from your CRM; bid strategy targets derived from your margins rather than set by habit; landing page tests where conversion rate is the constraint; and reporting that shows new-customer acquisition and cost per acquired customer.

For B2B and lead-generation accounts, the most valuable work is usually connecting Google Ads to the CRM so that bidding optimises toward qualified opportunities. Our comparison of Demand Gen and Performance Max for B2B pipeline explains how we decide which campaign types earn budget.

Agency, in-house or freelancer for Google Ads?

Google Ads rewards process, and a capable freelancer can run a simple account well — a local service business with a handful of search campaigns and phone-call conversions, for example. In-house makes sense when search is central to the business and the volume of keywords, products and markets justifies a full-time specialist.

An outside partner is most useful when the account has become complex enough that structure and measurement matter more than day-to-day bid changes: Performance Max with a large product feed, several markets or languages, offline conversions from a long sales cycle, or a suspicion that brand search is propping up the numbers. Whichever route you choose, make sure the account sits in your own Google Ads login, with the agency linked through its manager account rather than owning it.

How to evaluate a Google Ads agency

Ask to see how they would report brand and non-brand performance separately. Ask what they would do about Performance Max — how they get visibility into where it spends, and whether they would exclude brand terms. Ask how conversions will be tied to revenue or pipeline, and whether they set up offline conversion import. Ask how often they review the search terms report and who does it.

Then check the commercial basics: whether the fee depends on your spend, who owns the account and its history, how long the minimum term is, and who will actually work on it. Our guide to auditing a performance marketing agency in 48 hours gives a checklist you can use on your current provider as well as new ones.

What you get out of it

You can see what growth actually costs

Non-brand cost per acquired customer, reported on its own, is the number that tells you whether you can scale.

Performance Max becomes legible

With brand excluded and asset groups structured deliberately, PMax stops being a black box you fund on faith.

Bidding learns from revenue, not enquiries

Offline conversion import changes what smart bidding pursues — usually the single largest lever on a long-cycle account.

Budget stops chasing the easiest conversions

When the conversion action moves down the funnel, the algorithm stops optimising for the cheapest form fill available.

Cumulative contribution against customer acquisition cost over twelve months. Contribution accumulates month by month as a rising line, while acquisition cost is a flat line paid up front. The two cross once cumulative contribution overtakes acquisition cost. The shaded area before that crossing is the payback period, during which capital is committed.

Illustrative. Contribution accumulates monthly while the acquisition cost is paid up front. The shaded area is the period your capital is committed — the real constraint on how fast you can scale, regardless of how strong the LTV:CAC ratio looks.

Published engagements

Client names are withheld under NDA. Every figure comes from the engagement it is attached to.

This is for you if

Do not hire us if

Industries we serve

D2C & e-commerce

Shopping feed quality as a bidding input, and margin-aware values rather than flat revenue.

B2B SaaS

Offline conversion import so bidding optimises on opportunities and closed-won, not demo requests.

EdTech

Long consideration windows where the enquiry and the enrolment are months apart.

Real estate

High-value, geography-bound search where lead quality dominates lead volume.

Automotive & local retail

Local intent that converts offline, weeks after the click that Google measured.

Fintech & regulated

Consent-constrained measurement where Enhanced Conversions must be scoped carefully.

Check your own numbers before you talk to anyone

A working spreadsheet with live formulas: spend through to net contribution, blended CAC including the fees your ad platform excludes, and payback computed on contribution rather than revenue. No email required — it is a file, and you should be able to check our thinking before you hear our pitch.

Download the worksheet

Frequently Asked Questions

What does a Google performance marketing agency do?
It manages Google Search, Performance Max, Shopping, Demand Gen and YouTube campaigns against business outcomes — new customers, pipeline and profit — rather than cost per conversion alone. That includes separating brand from non-brand demand, connecting conversions to revenue with enhanced conversions and offline imports, and improving landing pages.
How much does a Google Ads agency cost?
Common models are a percentage of ad spend, a flat monthly fee, or a hybrid. Fluxsy does not take a percentage of spend. Every engagement is a monthly retainer priced on scope — $2,500–$6,000 per month in the US, ₹1,00,000–₹5,00,000 in India, £2,200–£5,000 in the UK, AED 4,000–AED 10,000 in the UAE, A$3,000–A$7,000 in Australia, C$3,000–C$7,000 in Canada, S$3,000–S$7,000 in Singapore and €2,500–€5,000 in Europe — depending on the number of channels and markets and how much tracking and CRM work is involved.
Should I hire a Google Ads agency or manage PPC in-house?
Simple, stable accounts can be run well in-house or by a freelancer. An agency or partner adds most value when the account is complex — Performance Max with a large feed, several markets, offline conversions from a long sales cycle — or when results have stalled and the measurement needs rebuilding.
Should brand search be in our Google Ads reporting at all?
It should be run, and it should be reported separately. Brand campaigns are cheap insurance against competitors bidding on your name, and they convert extremely well because those people already know you. The mistake is blending them into an account-level ROAS, where they make non-brand look far healthier than it is. Report both; manage them on different economics.
Is Performance Max worth running given how little it shows you?
For most e-commerce accounts, yes — but only with brand queries excluded, account-level negatives applied and asset groups structured so results are readable. Run without those, it will find the cheapest conversions in your account, which are usually people already searching for you, and report them as incremental growth.
What is offline conversion import and do we need it?
It sends events that happen after the click — qualified, opportunity, closed-won, with values — from your CRM back into Google Ads. If your sales cycle is longer than a few days, it is usually the highest-return change available, because without it smart bidding is optimising toward form fills while you are trying to buy customers.
Broad match increased our leads. Why would we change it?
Broad match plus smart bidding will reliably increase volume. The question is what happened to cost per closed customer, which most accounts do not measure. If the conversion action is a form fill, the system is doing exactly what it was asked. Move the conversion action downstream and the same setting often behaves very differently.
How is this different from what a normal PPC agency does?
Most of the work is outside the ads interface. Separating brand, importing closed-won revenue, deploying Enhanced Conversions and fixing feed quality are the levers that move an account materially. Keyword and bid management matters, but it is rarely the binding constraint on an account of any size.
Do you charge a percentage of ad spend?
No. That model pays the agency more when your budget grows, whether or not the growth was profitable, and it makes recommending a spend reduction structurally irrational. Every engagement is a monthly retainer priced on scope — $2,500–$6,000 per month in the US, ₹1,00,000–₹5,00,000 in India, £2,200–£5,000 in the UK, AED 4,000–AED 10,000 in the UAE, A$3,000–A$7,000 in Australia, C$3,000–C$7,000 in Canada, S$3,000–S$7,000 in Singapore and €2,500–€5,000 in Europe — depending on the number of channels and markets and how much tracking and CRM work is involved.
Do you work with companies outside India?
Yes. We are based in Bengaluru and work with companies across the US, UK, UAE, Singapore, Australia, Canada, New Zealand and Ireland. Engagements run remotely with working hours overlapping your timezone.
Who owns the tracking setup and models when we stop working together?
You do, entirely. Everything is built in your accounts under your credentials — server-side tracking configuration, unit-economics models, dashboards, playbooks. We do not hold code or withhold access at the end of an engagement.
Why can we not see your client names?
Our clients are under NDA, so engagements are described by sector and situation rather than named. We would rather show you a real result with the name withheld than a named logo we cannot substantiate, and we will walk you through the methodology and the measurement on a call.

How we work

Bring your Google Ads account

Forty-five minutes against your real data. You leave with brand and non-brand separated and a clear view of what growth actually costs you — whether or not you work with us.